| March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
D.D. Eatos Administrator
Posts : 2315
| Subject: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:33 pm | |
| Banned-Sangan -Wind-Up Zenmaity Limited-Wind-Up Magician -One Day of Peace -Solemn Warning Semi-Limited-Thunder King Rai-Oh -Tsukyomi -Advanced Ritual Art Unlimited-Spore -Blackwing - Kalut the Moon Shadow -Lightsworn Summoner - Lumina -Shien's Smoke Signal -Mind Crush My opinions: Augh wtf, you hit Wind-Ups to the point of extinction Konami T_T... and i actually started to like them... Sangan... better find a new level 3 Fiend and new searcher everyone! One Day of Peace... I guess someone gotta put their foot down on Final Countdown and Exodia, don't think it was all that necessary though :p Solemn Warning? Eh, i dont run anymore than 1 anyways, most of the time none... Thunder King Rai-Oh? Same; Never more than 2 Tsukyomi... no one thinks this card is broke in the game anymore. Advanced Ritual Art, well Demise, King of Armageddon, Herald of Perfection, and Gishki decks are going to popular again (: Spore, I don't even know what it was doing on there in the first place except for Tengu Synchro Spam Blackwing - Kalut The Moon Shadow, well now you have a reason to stop complaining Blackwing Players you bunch of Wind-Up Factory Haters. Lightsworn Summoner - Lumina, eh 2 is enough in my opinion. Maybe all you Hardcore Lightray and Sephylon players are happy in the pants at the moment :p Shien's Smoke Signal, oh hoho the best for last eh Konami? Why don't I just roll over and you can step on my face while you're at it? Credits Links to: Shriek Blog BanlistLord Michiru's Channel--> Original Video
Last edited by D.D. Eatos on Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:48 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| |
di3_romantic Active Member
Posts : 695
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:10 pm | |
| looks like im about to start playing with the six sams ._. |
|
| |
T.M.BladeBlaster Member
Posts : 8
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Sat Feb 16, 2013 3:10 am | |
| something needed to be done about those bullshit wind-ups anyway. only problem with this list is that they unlimited smoke signal, and didnt put rai-oh at 0. |
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:33 am | |
| well im gonna be playing evilswarm because it looks like all konami did was make ophion more broken so shien doesn't scare me |
|
| |
[s]Aint Administrator
Posts : 3910
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:59 pm | |
| Wonder why TK was hit at all.
And also weird that signal to 3, and they didn't ban gateway OR Ulti Offering.
Just Zenmaity could've been banned and it would've been fine. No need to hit magi with that.
But other than that, seems solid.
|
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:20 pm | |
| - Drink The Ocean wrote:
- Wonder why TK was hit at all.
And also weird that signal to 3, and they didn't ban gateway OR Ulti Offering.
Just Zenmaity could've been banned and it would've been fine. No need to hit magi with that.
But other than that, seems solid.
TK was hit because konami wants to sell spellbooks |
|
| |
D.D. Eatos Administrator
Posts : 2315
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:32 pm | |
| Spellbooks aren't THAT help less against Thunder King Rai-Oh
Spellbook of Power
Breaker the Magical Warrior
Strength of Prophecy
and High Priestess of Prophecy can over take Thunder King Rai-Oh.
If anything Spellbooks (as much as I like them) need a slow down. |
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:51 pm | |
| - D.D. Eatos wrote:
- Spellbooks aren't THAT help less against Thunder King Rai-Oh
Spellbook of Power
Breaker the Magical Warrior
Strength of Prophecy
and High Priestess of Prophecy can over take Thunder King Rai-Oh.
If anything Spellbooks (as much as I like them) need a slow down. no one uses breaker and strength is bad and GL with getting priestess on the field with TK |
|
| |
D.D. Eatos Administrator
Posts : 2315
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:31 pm | |
| There is nothing wrong with Tech-ing Breaker, and you can't negate High Priestess with Thunder King Rai-Oh -.- |
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:26 pm | |
| - D.D. Eatos wrote:
- There is nothing wrong with Tech-ing Breaker, and you can't negate High Priestess with Thunder King Rai-Oh -.-
I know and I was talking about searching it >_> |
|
| |
D.D. Eatos Administrator
Posts : 2315
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:27 pm | |
| Which brings me back to saying.. I use Temperance. If you wanna castrate yourself from cards thats your own business ¬__¬ |
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:15 pm | |
| - D.D. Eatos wrote:
- Which brings me back to saying.. I use Temperance. If you wanna castrate yourself from cards thats your own business ¬__¬
temprence is only good as a 1st turn play and after that it restricts your summoning of multiple priestesses |
|
| |
D.D. Eatos Administrator
Posts : 2315
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:21 pm | |
| thats subjective, so that has no effect on me ¬__¬ |
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:35 pm | |
| I like how this went form talking about the banlist to talking about prophecy XD so that's what the next banlist is gonna look like ^^ :P and this is my 1300th post |
|
| |
MegasNexal84 Member
Posts : 196
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:10 pm | |
| I feel like an idiot in this entire conversation |
|
| |
Emi Member
Posts : 26
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:03 pm | |
| Sangan D; Nooooooooo , Hm Btw why wont they unban Witch of the Black forest if they took sangan? |
|
| |
[s]Aint Administrator
Posts : 3910
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:59 pm | |
| Witch is too powerful of a searcher.
Sangan banned because of Crane Crane. (I prefer Sangan p_p) |
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:01 pm | |
| - Emi wrote:
- Sangan D; Nooooooooo , Hm Btw why wont they unban Witch of the Black forest if they took sangan?
because witch of the black searches things that should never be searched (ex. Dark Armed Dragon) |
|
| |
D.D. Eatos Administrator
Posts : 2315
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:52 am | |
| Witch has FAR more search options nowadays than Sangan could ever have, and being a Spellcasters give Spellbooks a little extra edge with Divine Judgement if youre not into searching Justice of course. I don't know if Sangan was banned due to Crane Crane, because Crane Crane isn't coming around until Judgment of the Light which will be a long time from now, but it's convincing seeing how it can get Sangan back due to its effect. Updated
|
|
| |
JasonRy8 Member
Posts : 128
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:06 am | |
| There was a Gishki OTK loop that involves Mind Augus, One Day of Peace, and Drawing out your opponent that was way too consistent. so yeah. |
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:05 pm | |
| - JasonRy8 wrote:
- There was a Gishki OTK loop that involves Mind Augus, One Day of Peace, and Drawing out your opponent that was way too consistent. so yeah.
lol I hate that loop |
|
| |
Resurrēctiō De Phoenicem Member
Posts : 29
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:13 pm | |
| I remember that but it was quite hit or miss depending on the draws since the spells need to come or else
|
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:24 pm | |
| - Resurrēctiō De Phoenicem wrote:
- I remember that but it was quite hit or miss depending on the draws since the spells need to come or else
ya it was never really consistent because so many things can go wrong |
|
| |
Lord_Michiru Member
Posts : 1
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:45 am | |
| Googling my name I came across this post cause I was credited here |
|
| |
cardgamesWTF Active Member
Posts : 1318
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:08 pm | |
| we know how this turned out |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) | |
| |
|
| |
| March 1, 2013 Banlist (OFFICIAL) | |
|