What Is This League? Why Is It Here?

Well, seeing as dorms are so mainstream (and no-one cares much for them anyway) , I decided to set-up a ranking system similar to dorms.

Match, you and your opponent decide on TCG/OCG , No Deck Switching After You Win.
Tournament winners and runner-ups also get points depending on the tournament.

There will be 3 divisions.
You all start out in the lowest division.

It is simple -- you start with 0 points. Work your way up to the highest division and you are the top duelist of the academy.
The ranking system ? The one with the most points, is the top duelist.

The 3 Divisions Are: Stardust -- Shooting Star -- Shooting Quasar.

0 points 30+ 50+


Bonus points are given if you win w/ 9000+ LP (1 point extra for each 2000 above upto 5 bonus points) , and/or You Win 2-0. Please provide screenshots//or opponents consent saying you won so. also one extra point is awarded for facing and winning against an opponent in a higher division.


The records of matches will be held on document as follows.



Dn name l acad name l Deckl vs. Dn name l acad name l Deck l Result l LP Left l Bonus Points Awarded l Final Points
____________________________________________________________________________________________



Please Have Fun! Sign Ups Are Below. Just Include Your DN Name.

ok im in
weedy007

weird

whats weird?

So how exactly does this work? We have teams or something like that... if so how do we choose our teams and why those particular leagues

Thesis wrote:

So how exactly does this work? We have teams or something like that... if so how do we choose our teams and why those particular leagues

Read It plz e.e


no teams. individuals.

each ranking is points.

start at sdd, when 30 -- Shooting Star, 50 is quasar division.

this ranking system is wierd

cardgamesWTF wrote:

this ranking system is wierd

a) how?

b) it's actually much more accurate than dorms and more fun

c) neater too

This is more accurate and organized. Lets the members do their own jobs :P

DN Name: Bingo
:3

Drink The Ocean wrote:

cardgamesWTF wrote:

this ranking system is wierd

a) how?

b) it's actually much more accurate than dorms and more fun

c) neater too

well we should let people take an entrance exam then they can rank up from there more people will agree with it that way and its much less work for lazy people and there's still a goal for people that want a goal

cardgamesWTF wrote:

Drink The Ocean wrote:

cardgamesWTF wrote:

this ranking system is wierd

a) how?

b) it's actually much more accurate than dorms and more fun

c) neater too

well we should let people take an entrance exam then they can rank up from there more people will agree with it that way and its much less work for lazy people and there's still a goal for people that want a goal

its more work for testers and innacurate.

Drink The Ocean wrote:

cardgamesWTF wrote:

Drink The Ocean wrote:

cardgamesWTF wrote:

this ranking system is wierd

a) how?

b) it's actually much more accurate than dorms and more fun

c) neater too

well we should let people take an entrance exam then they can rank up from there more people will agree with it that way and its much less work for lazy people and there's still a goal for people that want a goal

its more work for testers and innacurate.

I don't mind testing (as long as it isn't 2 duels and 10 ruling questions) and it is accurate because after the test they can still rank up and we can add people getting dropped down

inaccurate. more work for everyone. not as efficient or as fast.

Drink The Ocean wrote:

inaccurate. more work for everyone. not as efficient or as fast.

your system is slow it takes more time then people being tested then they rank up from there I would say its just as accurate

starting to rnak up in DN is slow ._.

this is accurate and like a game.

also, testing is still innumerably inaccurate.

Drink The Ocean wrote:

starting to rnak up in DN is slow ._.

this is accurate and like a game.

also, testing is still innumerably inaccurate.

wanna explain how testing is inaccurate?

one-two duels can't determine how good someone is accurately -- also sacking is easily possible in those very few duels. Also they are put in the eyes of the tester, which is flawed in itself. We are no longer just a duel academy--but an all-round academy; and are acting as such.

Drink The Ocean wrote:

one-two duels can't determine how good someone is accurately -- also sacking is easily possible in those very few duels. Also they are put in the eyes of the tester, which is flawed in itself. We are no longer just a duel academy--but an all-round academy; and are acting as such.

well I guess I agree with that but I still think people should take a ruling test to go up 1

I'm in :3

again: matches are open. Go challenge people (after posting it).